Despite the important progress made in recognizing the
value of the CIA designation and other internal audit-related certifications,
I am still surprised that many companies (at least in Canada) are still
requiring an accounting designation for their internal audit vacancies. The
accounting designation is always “a must-have”, while the CIA is “a plus
or nice to have”.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Are you getting the most from the ethics mandatory hours?
Like many of you at this time of year, I have been looking to take the mandatory two hours of ethics training to comply with the IIA cpe r...
.png)
-
Can Internal Auditing become Agile? Seven Keys to Thinking the Unthinkable . That was the title of a Forbes Article in 2017 w...
-
Almost two years ago ,a member of my LinkedIn group "Internal Audit & Risk Management Consultants " posted a discussion aski...
-
Internal Auditors are expected to provide advice on best practices, consulting services, and opinions on a wide range of issues. To be ab...
Wa'el Bibi,
ReplyDeleteYou're absolutely right about that requirement in Canada, and I really do not understand why! However, companies in Brazil do not make such requirement and usually give preference to professionals with the CIA designation, which I also think that makes a lot more sense.
In India also the same situation, most of companies ask CA (Chartered Accountants) for Internal Audit and CIA just as plus. IIA still needs a lot of efforts to make that reputation in many countries.
ReplyDelete