One More Time:Internal Audit & Geopolitical Risks!

Last year, I was asked by a newly established IIA Chapter in the Middle East to write an article, in Arabic, for their magazine.I thought the most pressing and relevant issue in an area like the Middle East would be the existing geopolitical risks.So, I wrote a short article discussing the role internal audit can play in providing assurance that the organization can successfully identify and manage top geopolitical risks!The chapter did not disappoint, it declined to publish the article on the basis it was too political.I was not surprised because I have a firm belief that culture influences everything from the mindset of internal auditors to the quality of the audit.In the case of that specific chapter, it was the culture of fear that influenced their decision.

 The article was not political at all! To the contrary, I urged internal auditors to keep a vigilant watch of geopolitical risks free of bias or any political agendas and to maintain the utmost independence at all times. I made it clear that evaluating geopolitical risks will not and should not convert internal auditors to political activists! I called upon internal auditors to evaluate the adequacy of the organization’s  disaster recovery and business continuation plans and procedures, in addition to the adequacy of its insurance coverage.

The recent rift in the Gulf is just another example of the importance of geopolitical risks.Internal auditors in the Middle East can hide their heads in the sand and pretend that business is as usual, or do what they are supposed to do in these disruptive and uncertain times!!

These are my thoughts please share yours!

Educate your Internal Auditors While you Entertain Them!

Get your copy today!

http://www.bibiconsulting.net/The-Internal-Auditor.html

Depending on What you Read:"Reading Can Seriously Damage your Ignorance"

I love this quote from "The Mindunleashed"! But, it can not be complete without pointing out that the damage is dependent on what you read!! The wrong readings (and/or correctly understanding what you read) may damage your intelligence, dignity and probably your humanity!!

Do you have what it takes to be an internal auditor?

Are you considering a career in internal audit? Or, are you a new internal auditor? This presentation may help you identify what it takes to be a successful internal auditor!

                            Contact us for details and pricing: adapgility@bibiconsulting.net

التدقيق الداخلي ونظرية المؤامرة

كتبت مؤخرا تدوينه باللغة الإنجليزية بعنوان " المدققون الداخليون يحصلون على علامتي رسوب" استعرضت فيها نتائج استبيانين قامت بأجراء الاول شركة برايس وترهاوس كوبرز بينما الاخر تم من قبل شركة بروتفتي. تناول الاستبيان الأول حال مهنة التدقيق الداخلي ورسم صورة قاتمة عن تراجع ثقة أصحاب المصلحة في قدرة التدقيق الداخلي على فهم متطلباتهم او إضافة منفعة حقيقية لشركاتهم. اما الاستبيان الثاني فتناول قدرات واحتياجات التدقيق الداخلي وخلص الى ان قلة من إدارات التدقيق الداخلي تستعين ببرامج تحليل البيانات او تتبع التدقيق المستمر!

لست هنا بصدد إعادة البحث في نتائج الاستبيانين وعلى من يرغب بالمزيد من التفاصيل الرجوع الى تدوينتي او الى التقارير التي صدرت عن الشركتين. ما اريد بحثه هنا هو رد فعل بعض المدققين على النتائج. كما هو متوقع فان الانكار كان الصفة الغالبة على ردود الفعل، بل وقام البعض بمهاجمة شركة برايس وترهاوس كوبرز واتهمها بعدم الحيادية وان النتائج التي توصلت اليها انما تهدف الى تشويه صورة التدقيق الداخلي لهدف تسويقي بحت. وقد كان من المستغرب أيضا ان يرد معهد المدققين الداخليين على التغطية الإعلامية لهذه النتائج عبر تدوينة لمديره التنفيذي بالإيحاء بانها اخبار كاذبة! لست هنا بصدد الدفاع عن   الشركة لان هذا ليس من شأني ولان الشركة أقدر مني على الرد على الاتهامات الموجهة اليها، علما بانه لا تربطني باي من الشركتين اية علاقة لا من قريب او بعيد. لكن وبغض النظر عن الأسلوب الذي اعتمدته الشركة في اجراء الاستبيان او في وجود نوايا تسويقية لها، فقد كان من الاجدر لو وجه التدقيق الداخلي هذه الطاقة المتدفقة في التوقف للحظة واغتنام الفرصة لأجراء تقييم ذاتي لأدائه في ضوء هذه النتائج بدلا من الانغماس في نظرية المؤامرة!

من الملفت للنظر ان نتائج استبيان شركة بروتفتي لم تواجه بسيل من النقد كسابقتها  ربما لان هناك اتفاق على واقعية النتائج التي توصلت اليها او لعدم أهميتها للمدققين الداخليين، او ربما لأنها  صدرت عن شركة خدمات  تدقيق داخلي اما الشركة الأخرى فهي شركة تدقيق حسابات خارجية! علما بان الافتراض الاخير نظرية مؤامرة من عندي!!   

      

Internal Auditors Have Received Two Failing Marks!

The results of two recent surveys conducted by PwC (2017 State of the Internal Audit Profession Study) and Protiviti( 2017 Internal Audit Capabilities and Needs Survey) were disappointing, to say the least. I know some of you may find the title of this article a little offensive, but keep in mind that we can’t overcome our weaknesses and move forward if we don’t address them honestly and go through a thorough performance self-assessment!

Let’s start with the PwC report. It starts with a depressing statement :

“Despite strong ambition from CAEs to grow their value to the organization, PwC’s 2017 State of the Internal Audit Profession study shows Internal Audit is losing ground in trying to keep pace with stakeholder expectations. In the five years, we’ve been tracking this sentiment, 2017 represented the lowest stakeholder perception of Internal Audit value.”

The survey shows that  only 44% of the surveyed stockholders reported that internal audit contributes significant value! To understand how bad this is, just compare it to the 2016 survey results of 54%!The study suggests that ,among other things, ongoing compliance burdens and pressure to do more with less have contributed to the decline in the perceived internal audit value. The study also shows that only 9% of the surveyed respondents consider internal audit as a trusted advisor! PwC recipe for an agile internal audit is to be prepared & adaptive.

The Protiviti survey which deals with “Data Analytics", shows that while Data analytics is gaining a foothold in internal auditing, most internal audit shops are still in their “analytics infancy”.! To put things into perspective ,Protiviti survey shows that 90% of the respondents rated their data analytics maturity between (initial – defined),while the remaining 10% rated it between (managed – optimized)!The picture is not brighter when it comes to continuous auditing!The survey reveals that:

“The use of continuous auditing remains surprisingly low, only 37% of all internal audit functions that utilize data analytics employ continuous auditing.”

I hope that these two surveys serve as another wake-up call to internal auditors. As I said in one in my tweets:

“The greatest risk to internal audit remains the traditional, unpragmatic  & uncreative mindset of internal auditors!”

There is no substitute to courageous, committed  and visionary internal audit leaders to reverse the results of the surveys and “make internal audit great again”!!

These are my thoughts, please share yours!